Traditional governance tokens fail to capture value
Tokens don't capture value by default
Most protocol tokens depreciate over time, even as protocols generate high revenue. Limited ownership rights make tokens ineffective for value capture.
The lack of standards breaks expectations
Each project designs tokenomics and governance independently, leading to misalignment between token holder expectations and actual outcomes.
Governance without accountability
Traditional token voting gives discretion over treasury and decisions without economic consequences: voters don't internalize the costs of bad decisions.
Misaligned incentives
Builders control assets while token holders have limited rights. This creates a fundamental disconnect between project success and token holder welfare.
How [Name TBD] solves the value accrual problem
Join the early-access waitlist
Be among the first community members to access early ownership token launches, and help shape the future of on-chain capital formation and governance.